Leading sectors and structural dynamics: an input-output analysis contrasting the BRICs growth paths

  • Guilherme Riccioppo Magacho Getúlio Vargas Foundation
  • Nelson Marconi Fundação Getúlio Vargas
  • Igor Rocha Fundação Getúlio Vargas
Keywords: Economic growth, BRICs, Input-output analysis, Sectoral specialization, Growth of Developing Countries, Patterns of Development.


Although all the BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India and China) experienced a period of significant growth during the 2000s, their growth paths were far from homogenous. The growth path followed by Brazil and Russia was based on the production and export of primary goods, while in China and India the pattern of industrial development remained grounded in manufacturing exports and services, respectively. These distinct trajectories resulted in a vast range of interpretations about sectors that act as the relevant engines of growth. On the one hand, some economists supported the idea that expansion based on the production and export of commodities or services had no negative effect once these countries were exploiting their comparative advantages. Alternatively, the main argument of those who did not support economic growth based on primary product exports was that development is essentially a process of structural change, and sustained economic growth is associated with the capacity to diversify the structure of domestic production.

With the aim of analyzing the different growth paths of the BRIC countries in recent decades and their long-term consequences, this study assessed the potential of each sector to promote economic growth. Input-output tables were used to calculate each sector’s output multipliers, Rasmussen-Hirschman backward and forward linkage indexes, and pure normalized backward and forward linkage indexes with the aim of assessing which sectoral orientation has a higher potential to stimulate the economy as a whole. The results show that manufacturing is the sector where the multipliers are the highest, while they are the lowest in agriculture and mineral commodities. The findings corroborate the hypothesis that having a dynamic manufacturing sector is essential to promote economic growth. Moreover, the results show that forward linkages are larger than backward linkages for services and that modern services present slightly larger forward linkages than those observed for traditional services. In that way, the hypothesis that the output of services depends on production in other sectors, and hence that a service-oriented strategy is linked to manufacturing production and exports, is reinforced. 


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Guilherme Riccioppo Magacho, Getúlio Vargas Foundation
Possui graduação em Economia pela Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade - USP (2008) e mestrado em Teoria Econômica pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas (2012). Atualmente faz doutorado em Economia, na Universidade de Cambridge (Inglaterra).


Blecker, R. A., & Razmi, A. (2010). Export-led Growth, Real Exchange Rates and the Fallacy of Composition. In M. Setterfield (Ed.), Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth (pp. 379–396). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805582.00030

Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2008). The Dutch disease and its neutralization: a Ricardian approach. Revista de Economia Política, 28(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0101-31572008000100003

Brunnschweiler, C. (2008). Cursing the Blessings? Natural Resource Abundance, Institutions, and Economic Growth. World Development, 36(3), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2007.03.004

Bulte, E. H., Damania, R., & Deacon, R. T. (2005). Resource intensity, institutions, and development. World Development, 33(7), 1029–1044. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.04.004

Cella, G. (1984). The input-output measurement of interindustry linkages. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 46(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1984.mp46001005.x

Chayanov, A. (1966). The theory of peasant economy. (B. K. Thorner & R. Smith, Eds.). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.

Chenery, H., Robinson, S., & Syrquin, M. (1986). Industrialization and Growth. New York: Oxford University Press.

Clements, B. J. (1990). On the decomposition and normalization of interindustry linkages. Economics Letters, 33(4), 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(90)90084-E

Corden, W. M., & Neary, J. P. (1982). Booming Sector and De-Industrialisation in a Small Open Economy. The Economic Journal, 92(368), 825–848. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232670

Cornwall, J. (1977). Modern Capitalism, It’s Growth and Transformation. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Daniele, V. (2011). Natural Resources and the ‘Quality’ of Economic Development. Journal of Development Studies, 47(4), 545–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2010.506915

Dasgupta, S., & Singh, A. (2005). Will Services be the New Engine of Indian Economic Growth? Development and Change, 36(6), 1035–1057. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00449.x

Dasgupta, S., & Singh, A. (2007). Manufacturing, Services and Premature Deindustrialization in Developing Countries: A Kaldorian Analysis. In Advancing Development (pp. 435–454). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230801462_23

Davis, G. A. (1995). Learning to love the Dutch disease: Evidence from the mineral economies. World Development, 23(10), 1765–1779. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00071-J

Dixon, R., & Thirlwall, A. P. (1975). A model of regional growth-rate differences on Kaldorian lines. Oxford Economic Papers, 27(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041312

Eichengreen, B., & Gupta, P. (2012). The real exchange rate and export growth: are services different? MPRA Paper. (No. 43358). University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/43358/. Accessed on February 15th, 2019.

Evangelista, R., Lucchese, M., & Meliciani, V. (2014). Manufacturing exports and the impact on business services. In Workshop Explaining Economic Change (pp. 1–31). Roma: Sapienza Università di Roma. Available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi= Accessed on February 15th, 2019.

Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (1999). Modern Capitalism in the 1970s and 1980s. In M. Setterfield (Ed.), Growth, Employment and Inflation. Houndmills, Basingstoke: MacMillan.

Furtado, C. (2000). Elementos de uma teoria do subdesenvolvimento. In R. Bielschowsky (Ed.), Cinquenta anos de pensamento na CEPAL (vol.1, pp. 240–262). Rio de Janeiro: Record. https://doi.org/1961(Original work published in 1961)

Ghani, E., Goswami, A. G., & Kharas, H. (2011, December). Can services be the next growth escalator? Vox, CEPR Policy Portal. Retrieved from http://www.voxeu.org/article/can-services-be-next-growth-escalator. Accessed on February 15th, 2019.

Guilhoto, J. (2009). Análise de Insumo-Produto: teoria, fundamentos e aplicações. São Paulo: Department of Economics, FEA-USP.

Guilhoto, J., Sonis, M., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2005). Linkages and Multipliers in a Multiregional Framework: Integration of Alternative Approaches. SSRN Electronic Journal, (8). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2419585

Guilhoto, J., Sonis, M., Hewings, G., & Martins, E. (1994). Índices de ligações e setores-chave na economia brasileira: 1959/80. Pesquisa e Planejamento Econômico, 24(2), 287–314.

Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Simoes, A., & Yildirim, M. A. (2014). The Atlas of Economic Complexity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9647.001.0001

Hausmann, R., Hwang, J., & Rodrik, D. (2007). What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-006-9009-4

Hirschman, A. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, TC: Yale University Press.

Kaldor, N. (1981). The role of increasing returns, technical progress and cumulative causation in the theory of international trade and economic growth. Economie Appliquee, 34(6), 593–617.

Kaldor, N. (1989). Causes of the slow rate of economic growth in the United Kingdom. In F. Targetti & A. Thirlwall (Eds.), The Essential Kaldor. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers. (Original work published in 1966)

Leontief, W. (1951). The Structure of the American Economy (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Lewis, A. W. (1969). Economic Development with Unlimited Supply of Labor. In A. Agarwala & S. Singh (Eds.), The Economics of Underdevelopment (pp. 400–499). London, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work published in 1954).

Lipton, M. (1968). Strategy for Agriculture: Urban Bias and Rural Planning. In P. Streeten & M. Lipton (Eds.), The Crisis of Indian Planning: Economic Planning in the 1960s (pp. 83–147). London: Oxford University Press.

Lodefalk, M. (2013). Servicification of manufacturing: evidence from Sweden. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 6(1), 87–113. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEBR.2013.054855

Mccombie, J., & Thirlwall, A. (1994a). The Balance-of-Payment constraint as an explanation of international growth rates differences. New York: ST Martin’s Press.

Mccombie, J., & Thirlwall, A. (1994b). Economic growth and the balance-of-payments constraints. New York: ST. Martin’s Press.

Mckinsey & Company (2012). Manufacturing the future: the next era of global growth and innovation, New York: McKinsey Global Institute.

Mikesell, R. F. (1997). Explaining the resource curse, with special reference to mineral-exporting countries. Resources Policy, 23(4), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4207(97)00036-6

Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input-Output Analisys: Foundations and Extensions (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Cambrige: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Moreno-Brid, J. C. (2003). Capital Flows, Interest Payments and the Balance-of-Payments Constrained Growth Model: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Metroeconomica, 54(2–3), 346–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-999X.00170

Nordås, H. K., & Kim, Y. (2013). The Role of Services for Competitiveness in Manufacturing, OECD Trade Policy Papers (148). OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k484xb7cx6b-en

OECD (2005). Growth on services: Fostering Employment, Productivity and Innovation. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), France.

Palma, G. (2005). Four sources of “de-industrialization” and a new concept of the “dutch disease.” (J. A. Ocampo, Ed.), Beyond reforms: structural dynamics and macroeconomic vulnerability. Palo Alto, CA; Washington, DC: Stanford University Press and The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-5819-7

Prates, D. (2006). A inserção externa da economia brasileira no governo Lula. In R. Carneiro (Ed.), A Supremacia dos Mercados e a Política Econômica do Governo Lula. Sao Paulo: Editora UNESP publishing house.

Prebisch, R. (2000). O desenvolvimento econômico da América Latina e seus principais problemas. In R. Bielschowsky (Ed.), Cinquenta anos de pensamento na CEPAL (1st ed., pp. 69–136). Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Record. (Original work published in 1949)

Rasmussen, P. (1956). Studies in Intersectoral Relations. Amsterdam: North Holland.

Rocha, I. (2011). Reestruturação industrial no Brasil: uma análise da dinâmica comercial e produtiva da economia (Mphil Dissertation). Instituto de Economia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Retrieved from http://bdtd.ibict.br/vufind/Record/CAMP_b0c2a3a0ac456006c3d57452c6f47c94

Rodrik, D. (2007). Industrial development: Some stylized facts and policy directions. In Industrial Development for the 21st Century: Sustainable Development Perspectives (pp. 7–28). New York: Division for Sustainable Development, United Nations.

Rosenstein-Rodan, P. N. (1943). Problems of Industrialisation of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. The Economic Journal, 53(210/211), 202. https://doi.org/10.2307/2226317

Rostow, W. (1960). The stages of growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (2001). The curse of natural resources. European Economic Review, 45(4–6), 827–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00125-8

Schultz, T. (1964). Transforming traditional agriculture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Singer, H. (1950). The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. American Economic Review, 40(2), 473–485.

Szirmai, A. (2012). Industrialisation as an engine of growth in developing countries, 1950–2005. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(4), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2011.01.005

Tavares, M. (1998). Ciclo e crise: o movimento recente da industrialização brasileira (Coleção 30 anos de Economia). Campinas: IE/Unicamp.

Thirlwall, A. P. (2004). The balance of payments constraint as an explanation of international growth rate differences. In J. S. L. McCombie & A. P. Thirlwall (Eds.), Essays on Balance of Payments Constrained Growth (pp. 39–45). London: Routledge.

Thirlwall, A. P., & Hussain, M. N. (1982). The balance of payments constraint, capital flows and growth rate differences between developing countries. Oxford Economic Papers, 34(3), 498–510. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041565

Timmer, M. P., de Vries, G. J., & de Vries, K. (2015). Patterns of Structural Change in Developing Countries. In J. Weiss & M. Tribe (Eds.), Handbook of Industry and Development (pp. 65–83). Routledge.

Timmer, M. P., Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R., & de Vries, G. J. (2015b). An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input-Output Database: the Case of Global Automotive Production. Review of International Economics, 23(3), 575–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12178

UNIDO – United Nations Industrial Development Organization (2012). UNIDO Annual Report 2012. Vienna: United Nations.

Verdoorn, P. J. (1949). On the factors determining the growth of labour productivity. In Italian Economic Papers (pp. 45–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

World Bank (2014). World Development Indicators (WDI). Washington: World Bank. Retrieved from http://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/

How to Cite
Magacho, G. R., Marconi, N., & Rocha, I. (2019). Leading sectors and structural dynamics: an input-output analysis contrasting the BRICs growth paths. Brazilian Keynesian Review, 4(2), 195-223. https://doi.org/10.33834/bkr.v4i2.127