Brazilian co-authorship overseas: the Journal of Post Keynesian Economics and related journals
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to evaluate the importance of post-Keynesianism ideas for international scientific production of Brazilian researchers. The methodology employed uses an econometric technique in order to analyze the Brazilian participation in nine scientific journals in the course of twenty years: 1997-2016. The probability of a Brazilian co-author being greater for The Journal of Post Keynesian Economics (hereinafter JPKE) - in relation to the other journals - was evaluated by means of a logit, in which the dependent variable assumes value one when at least one co-author of the given article is Brazilian and zero otherwise. The results show that the probability of Brazilian co-authorship is greater for heterodox journals, especially JPKE.
Downloads
References
Almeida, I. C. de S., Almeida, R. G. de, & Carvalho, L. R. de. (2018). Academic rankings and pluralism: The case of Brazil and the new version of Qualis. EconomiA, 19(3), 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2018.03.003
Bresser-Pereira, L. (2012). For a heterodox mainstream economics: An academic manifesto. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 35(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477350101
Carvalho, F. J. C. de. (2008). Keynes e o Brasil. Economia e Sociedade, 17(spe), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-06182008000400003
Clarivate Analytics (2019). Web of Science. Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/products/web-of-science
Colander, D., Holt, R. P. F., & Rosser, J. B. (2004). The changing face of mainstream economics. Review of Political Economy, 16(4), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953825042000256702
Dammski, B. R., Cavalieri, M. A. R., & Pinto, J. S. D. P. (2017). Mapeando o pós-keynesianismo: Uma abordagem cientométrica. Estudos Economicos, 47(4), 741–772. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-416147447bmj
Davidson, P. (2002). Restating the purpose of the JPKE after 25 years. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 25(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2002.11051344
Dequech, D. (2007). Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 30(2), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477300207
Dequech, D. (2018). Applying the Concept of Mainstream Economics outside the United States: General Remarks and the Case of Brazil as an Example of the Institutionalization of Pluralism. Journal of Economic Issues, 52(4), 904–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2018.1518532
Faria, J. R., Araujo Jr., A. F. de, & Shikida, C. D. (2007a). The citation pattern of Brazilian economists. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 37(1), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0101-41612007000100006
Faria, J. R., Araujo, A. F., & Shikida, C. D. (2007b). The international research of academic economists in Brazil: 1999-2006. Economia Aplicada, 11(3), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-80502007000300004
Fernández, R. G., & Suprinyak, C. E. (2016). Manufacturing Pluralism in Brazilian Economics: The role of ANPEC as institutional mediator and stabilizer. In Anais do XLIV Encontro Nacional de Economia ANPEC (pp. 1–19). Foz do Iguaçu: ANPEC. Retrieved from https://www.anpec.org.br/encontro/2016/submissao/files_I/i1424f2f0260f894e0f0ade26c6e3de7b0.docx
Kapeller, J. (2010). Some critical notes on citation metrics and heterodox economics. Review of Radical Political Economics, 42(3), 330–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613410377855
King, J. E. (2002). A history of post Keynesian economics since 1936. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Kocher, M. G., & Sutter, M. (2001). The Institutional Concentration of Authors in Top Journals of Economics During the Last Two Decades. The Economic Journal, 111(472), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00637
Lee, F. (2009). A history of heterodox economics: challenging the mainstream in the twentieth century (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
Lee, F. S. (2008). Informational directory for heterodox economists: Graduate and undergraduate programs, journals, publishers and book series, associations, blogs, and institutes and other websites. Kansas City, Missouri: Department of Economics, University of Missouri-Kansas City. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.694.7543&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Novaes, W. (2008). A pesquisa em economia no Brasil: Uma avaliação empírica dos conflitos entre quantidade e qualidade. Revista Brasileira de Economia, 62(4), 467–495. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71402008000400005
Paula, L. F., & Ferrari Filho, F. (2010). The spread of Keynesianism in Brazil: The origins and experience of the Brazilian Keynesian Association. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 7(2), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2010.02.04
Robinson, J. (1971). Economic heresies: some old-fashioned questions in economic theory (1st ed.). London: MacMillan.
Copyright (c) 2020 Caio Matteucci de Andrade Lopes, Renata de Lacerda Antunes Borges Lopes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors keep copyrights and concede to the Journal the right to the first publication, with the paper simultaneously licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which allows recognised author and journal work sharing.
- Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive versions of the paper published in this journal (e.g.: publish in an instituional repository or as a book chapter) with the recogntion of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed (and are estimulated) to publish and distribute their work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or at their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, once this may generate productive alterations on the paper, as well as increse the factor of impact and quotation of the published paper (please, see Free Access Effect)
