Economic theory and (ontological) reductionism: some pitfalls in the road of the microfoundations project

Keywords: economic methodology, reductionism, microfoundations


This paper aims to survey the literature on the theoretical enterprise of providing the microfoundations of macroeconomics. To do so, it evaluates that project from the viewpoint of economic methodology, mostly of critical realism. Its novelty lies in analysing the reductionism inbuilt in the project and its unsuitability both to its own terms and to the purpose of illuminating socioeconomic reality. We also stress that, in addition to a project of science (the sound or rigorous way of doing ‘scientific’ economics), it includes an implicit ontology of market sociability that establishes links between microfoundations and the neoliberal ideology. Some attempts at overcoming the reductionist individualism of microfoundations are also evaluated, such as complexity theory and old institutionalism, pointing out its potential and shortcomings. In order to deal with a complex, hierarchically multi-level structured and open reality, economic theory should not adopt explanations that give precedence to a single level. It should instead prefer approaches in which micro and macro levels are mutually conditioned and relatively autonomous.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Celso Pereira Neris Jr., Economics Department, Sao Paulo State University – UNESP
Doutor em Teoria Econômica pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) em 2017. Atualmente, sou professor substituto no Depto. de Economia da UNESP e sou pós-doutorando no programa de pós-graduação em economia da UNESP. Atuo como pesquisador do Grupo de Estudos em Economia Industrial (GEEIN) da FCL/UNESP e do Laboratório de Estudos das Indústrias Aeroespaciais e de Defesa (LabA&D) da FCA/UNICAMP. Lido com temas relacionados à metodologia da economia, economia da inovação e organização industrial.


Boldyrev, I.; Svetlova, E. (eds.) (2016) “Enacting dismal science: new perspectives on the performativity of economics”. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Caldwell, B.J. (1991) “Clarifying popper”, Journal of Economic Literature 29(1): p.1-33. JSTOR,, Accessed 6 Apr. 2021.

Cerqueira, H.G. (2002) “A Economia Evolucionista: Um capítulo sistêmico da teoria econômica?”, Análise Econômica 20(37), p. 55-79.

Chick, V. (2016) “On microfoundations and Keynes economics”, Review of Political Economy 28(1), p. 99-112.

Colander, D.J. (2010) “The economics profession, the financial crisis, and method”, Journal of Economic Methodology 17(4), p. 419-427.

Colander, D.J. (2013) “The systemic failure of economic methodologists”, Journal of Economic Methodology 20(1), p. 56-68.

Colander, D.J.; Holt, R. e Rosser Jr., J.B. (2004) “The changing face of mainstream economics”, Review of Political Economy 16(4), p. 485-499.

Colander, D. J.; Goldberg, M.; Haas, A.; Juselius, K.; Kirman, A.; Lux, T. e Sloth, B. (2009) “The financial crisis and the systemic failure of the economics profession”, Critical Review 21(2), p. 249–267.

Davis, J.B. (2008) “The turn in recent economics and return of orthodoxy”. Cambridge Journal of Economics 32(3), p. 349-368.

Denis, A. (2004) “Two rhetorical strategies of laissez-faire”, Journal of Economic Methodology 11(3), p. 341-357.

Elster, J. (1983) “Explaining technical change”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Elster, J. (2009) “Excessive ambitions”, Capitalism and Society 4(2), p. 1-30.

Fine, B. e Milonakis, D. (2009) “From economic imperialism to freakonomics: the shifiting boundaries between economics and other social sciences”. London: Routledge.

Friedman, M. (1962) “Capitalism and freedom”. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Fucidji, J.R.; Almeida, R.F.; Neris Jr., C.P. (2016) “Performatividade da ciência econômica: clarificando os termos e construindo pontes", 44º. Encontro Nacional de Economia ANPEC, Foz do Iguaçu, Available at, Accessed 6 Apr. 2021.

Ganem, A. (1996) “Demonstrar a ordem racional do mercado: Reflexões em torno de um projeto impossível”. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 16(2), p. 105-122.

Gilbert, N. (2002) “Varieties of emergence”, In: Sallach, D. (ed.) Social agents: ecology, exchange, and evolution. The 2002 Agent Conference. Chicago: University of Chicago e Argonne National Laboratory, p. 41-56.

Goodfriend, M. e King, R. (1997) “The new Neoclassical Synthesis and the role of monetary policy”. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 12, p. 231-283.

Hahn, F.H. e Negishi, T. (1962) “A theorem of non-tâtonnement stability”, Econometrica 30(3), p. 463-469.

Hayek, F.A. (1967) “Notes on the evolution of systems of rules of conduct”, In: Hayek, F.A. Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p. 66‐81.

Hodgson, G.M. (1993) “Why the problem of reductionism in biology has implications for economics”, World Futures 37(2-3): p. 69-90.

Hodgson, G.M. (2000) “From micro to macro: the concept of emergence and the role of institutions”, In: Burlamaqui, L.; Castro, A.; e Chang, H. (eds.) Institutions and the role of the State. New York: Edward Elgar, p. 103-126.

Hodgson, G.M. (2007) “Meanings of methodological individualism”, Journal of Economic Methodology 14(2), p. 211-226.

Hoffmann, R. e Pelaez, V. (2011) “A psicologia econômica como resposta ao individualismo metodológico”, Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 31(2), p. 262-282.

Janssen, M.C.W. (1991) “The alleged necessity of microfoundations”, Journal of Macroeconomics 13(4), p. 619-639.

Janssen, M.C.W. (2008) “Microfoundations”, In: Durlauf, S.N. e Blume, L.E. (eds.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics 5, p. 600-604.

King, J.E. (2012) “The microfoundations delusion – metaphor and dogma in the history of macroeconomics”. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Kirman, A. (2016) “Complexity and economic policy: a paradigm shift or a change in perspective? – a review essay on David Colander and Roland Kuper’s Complexity and the art of public policy”, Journal of Economic Literature 54(2), p. 534-572.

Lawson, T. (1997) “Economics and reality”, London: Routledge.

Lawson, T. (2014) “A conception of ontology”, in: Pratten, S. (ed.) Social ontology and modern economics, London: Routledge, p. 19-52.

Lucas, R. E. (1987) “Models of business cycles”. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Mäki, U. (2006). “On the method of isolation in economics”, In Davis, J. e Davis, J.B. (eds), Recent developments in economic methodology, Edward Edgar, Cheltenham 3, p. 3-37.

Mayr, E. (1985) “How biology differs from the physical sciences”, In: Depew, D.J. e Weber, B.H. (eds.), Evolution at a crossroads: the new biology and the new philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, p. 43-63.

O‘Neill, J. (2004) “Ecological economics and the politics of knowledge: the debate between Hayek and Neurath”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 28(3), p. 431-447.

Palley, T. (2013) “Gattopardo economics: the crisis and the mainstream response of change that keeps things the same”, European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies Intervention 10(2), p. 193-206.

Prado, E. (2006) “Microeconomia reducionista e microeconomia sistêmica”, Nova Economia 16(2), p. 303-322.

Rizvi, S.A.T. (1994) “The microfoundations project in general equilibrium theory”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 18(4), p. 357-377.

Rosser Jr., J.B. (ed.) (2004) “Complexity in economics”. New York: Edward Elgar.

Runde, J. (1998) “Assessing causal economic explanation”, Oxford Economic Papers 50(1), p. 151-172.

Sawyer, R.K. (2001) “Emergence in sociology: contemporary philosophy of mind and some implications for social theory”, American Journal of Sociology 107(3), p. 551-585.

Schaffner, K.F. (1967) “Approaches to reduction”, Philosophy of Science 34(2): p. 137-147. JSTOR,, Accessed 6 Apr. 2021.

Soromenho, J. (2000) “Microfundamentos e sociabilidade”. EconomiA (Anpec) 1(2), p. 185-219.

Squazzoni, F. (2010) “The impact of agent-based models in the social sciences after 15 years of incursions”, History of Economic Ideas 18(2): p. 197-233. STOR,, Accessed 6 Apr. 2021.

Udéhn, L. (2001) “Methodological individualism: background, history and meaning”. London: Routledge.

Udéhn, L. (2002) “The changing face of methodological individualism”, Annual Review of Sociology 28, p. 479-507.

Vercelli, A. (2016) “Microfoundations, methodological individualism and alternative economic visions”, Review of Political Economy 28(1), p. 153-167.

How to Cite
Neris Jr., C. P., & Fucidji, J. R. (2021). Economic theory and (ontological) reductionism: some pitfalls in the road of the microfoundations project. Brazilian Keynesian Review, 6(2), 192-214.