Crescimento, demanda agregada e distribuição pessoal da renda no Brasil: 1996 a 2015
Abstract
Considering the Post-Keynesian economic growth literature, the demand regimes emerge as an important factor. The demand regimes explore the impact of changes in the functional income distribution on economic growth. In the case of redistribution of income from profits to wages promotes economic growth, it’s said the economy is wage-led, in the opposite case, the economy is profit-led. This research estimates a Vector Autoregression (VAR) from 1996 to 2015 to investigate if the Brazilian demand regime can be considered wage-led or profit-led. Furthermore, it is included the personal income distribution with the purpose to avoid a possible omitted variable bias arising for ignoring the effects that a changing on that distribution can has over demand regimes.
Downloads
References
Araújo, E., & Gala, P. (2012), “Regimes de crescimento econômico no Brasil: evidências empíricas e implicações de política”. Estudos avançados, 26(75), p. 41-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142012000200004
Azevedo, L. F. D., Fonseca, P. C. D., & Missio, F. J. (2022), “Distribuição de renda e regime de crescimento econômico no Brasil: avaliação e propostas”. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 42, p. 25-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572021-3244
Bacha, E. L., & Taylor, L. (1978), “Brazilian income distribution in the 1960s: Tacts’ model results and the controversy”. The Journal of Development Studies, 14(3), p.271-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220387808421676
Barbosa‐Filho, N. H., & Taylor, L. (2006), “Distributive and demand cycles in the US economy—a structuralist Goodwin model”. Metroeconomica, 57(3), p. 389-411.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-999X.2006.00250.x
Bhaduri, A., & Marglin, S. (1990), “Unemployment and the real wage: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies”. Cambridge journal of Economics, 14(4), p. 375-393. DOI: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23598376.
Accessed 31 May 2022.
Epstein, G. A., & Gintis, H. M. (Eds.). (1995), Macroeconomic policy after the conservative era: Studies in investment, saving and finance. Cambridge University Press.
Burle, J., & Carvalho, L. B. de. (2021), “Omitted-variable bias in demand-regime estimations: the role of household credit and wage inequality in Brazil”. Review of Keynesian Economics, 9(3), 368–393. DOI: 10.4337/roke.2021.03.04
Carvalho, L., & Rezai, A. (2016), “Personal income inequality and aggregate demand”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(2), 491-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beu085
Carvalho, Laura, Rugitsky, Fernando. (2015), “Growth and distribution in Brazil in the 21st century: revisiting the wage-led versus profit-led debate.” Department of Economics FEA/USP Working Paper Series, n. 2015-25.
de Jesus, C. S., Araujo, R. A., & Drumond, C. E. (2018), “An empirical test of the Post-Keynesian growth model applied to functional income distribution and the growth regime in Brazil”. International review of applied economics, 32(4), p. 428-449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2017.1351528
Dutt, A. K. (1984), “Stagnation, income distribution and monopoly power”. Cambridge journal of Economics, 8(1), p.25-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035533
Franke, R., Flaschel, P., & Proaño, C. R. (2006), “Wage–price dynamics and income distribution in a semi-structural Keynes–Goodwin model”. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 17(4), p. 452-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2006.08.001
Gollin, D. (2002), “Getting income shares right”. Journal of political Economy, 110(2), p. 458-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/338747
Gonçalves, J. B. (2017), “Distribuição de renda e demanda agregada no Brasil (1995-2013): uma análise a partir de extensões aos modelos neo-kaleckianos”. (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo). DOI: 10.11606/D.12.2017.tde-18102017-145419. Acesso em: 2022-05-31
Hein, E. (2014), Distribution and growth after Keynes: A Post-Keynesian guide. Edward Elgar Publishing
Hoffmann, R., & Duarte, J. C. (1972), “A distribuição da renda no Brasil”. RAE-Revista De Administração De Empresas, 12(2), p. 46–66. Recuperado de https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/40271
Hoffmann, R. (1973), “Considerações sobre a evolução recente da distribuição da renda no Brasil”, Revista de administração de empresas, 13, 07-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75901973000400001
Keynes, J. M. (1936 [2017]), Teoria geral do emprego, do juro e da moeda. Saraiva Educação SA.
Kurz, H. D. (1991), Technical change, growth and distribution: a steady-state approach to ‘unsteady’growth on Kaldorian lines. In Nicholas Kaldor and Mainstream Economics (pp. 421-448). Palgrave Macmillan, London. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-10947-0_24
Langoni, C. G. (1973), Distribuição da renda e desenvolvimento econômico do Brasil. Editora Expressão e Cultura.
Lavinas, L. (2013), “21st century welfare”. New left review, 84(6), p. 5-40.
Malan, P. S. (1974), “Ainda sobre a distribuição da renda”, Revista de Administração de Empresas, 14, 116-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75901974000200009
Medeiros, M., Souza, P. H., & Castro, F. A. D. (2015), “O topo da distribuição de renda no Brasil: primeiras estimativas com dados tributários e comparação com pesquisas domiciliares (2006-2012)”, Dados, 58, 7-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/00115258201537
Palley, T. (2014), Rethinking Wage Vs. Profit-led Growth Theory With Implications for Policy Analysis. Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung. ISSN: 1861-2199
Piketty, T.; Goldhammer, A. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press, Disponível em: <http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt6wpqbc>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674982918
Rowthorn, R. E. (1981), Demand, real wages and economic growth. Thames Polytechnic, 1981. ISBN-10: 0902169173
Souza, P. H. G. F. d. (2016), “A desigualdade vista do topo: a concentração de renda entre os ricos no brasil, 1926-2013”. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26512/2016.09.T.22005
Copyright (c) 2022 Alex Almeida, Douglas Alencar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors keep copyrights and concede to the Journal the right to the first publication, with the paper simultaneously licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which allows recognised author and journal work sharing.
- Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive versions of the paper published in this journal (e.g.: publish in an instituional repository or as a book chapter) with the recogntion of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed (and are estimulated) to publish and distribute their work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or at their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, once this may generate productive alterations on the paper, as well as increse the factor of impact and quotation of the published paper (please, see Free Access Effect)
