The Brazilian economic authorities’ action during the covid-19 crisis and an empirical analysis of the fiscal and monetary policies in the period 1996-2020

  • Elisangela Luzia Araujo Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
  • Eliane Araújo Universidade Estadual de Maringá e pesquisadora do CNPQ
  • Fernando Ferrari Filho Professor aposentado da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul e pesquisador CNPQ


This article analyses the countercyclical economic policies, in particular the fiscal and monetary ones, implemented by the Brazilian Economic Authorities (BEAs) in response to the COVID-19 crisis of 2020, as well as it presents an empirical analysis of these economic policies during the period 1996-2020. The main objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of those policies in economic contexts of growth and crisis to aim at showing that countercyclical Keynesian economic policies matter. The empirical part of the article analyzes the effects of fiscal (government spending) and monetary (interest rate) policies on the Brazilian economy during the period 1996-2020. Thus, it is estimated a MS-VAR model to analyze the impact of these economic policies in periods of economic growth and economic crisis. The main results indicate that the effects of fiscal and monetary policies are more pronounced in situations of economic crises than in contexts of economic growths, supporting, thus, the Idea that countercyclical fiscal and monetary policies are able to affect the economic cycles, mainly in periods of crises, as emphasized by Keynes.


Download data is not yet available.


Artis, M.; Canova, F.; Gali, J.; Giavazzi, F.; Portes, R.; Reichlin, L.; Uhlig, H.; Weil, P. (2003). Business cycle dating committee of the Centre for Economic Policy Research. CEPR, 22 September, 14 p.

Auerbach, A.; Gorodnichenko, Y. (2012). Measuring the Output Responses to Fiscal Policy. American Economic Journal – Economic Policy, 4, 1-27.

______________ (2013). Fiscal Multipliers in Recession and Expansion. In: ALESINA, A.; Giavazzi, F. (eds), Fiscal Policy after the Financial Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

______________(2017). Fiscal stimulus and fiscal sustainability. NBER Working Paper No. 23789, 50p.

Banco Central do Brasil (BCB). (2020). Acompanhamento de medidas de combate ao Covid 19. Disponível em: Acesso em dezembro de 2020.

______________(2021). Estatísticas. Disponível em: Acesso em 10 de agosto de 2021.

Baumeister, C.; Benati, L. (2012). Unconventional Monetary Policy and the Great Recession: Estimating the Impact of a Compression in the Yield Spread at the Zero Lower Bound. European Central Bank Working Paper Series No. 1258. Frankfurt: European Central Bank, October, 52p.

Blanchard, O.; Perotti, R. (2002). An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamic Effects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1329-1368.

Enders, W.(2010). Applied Econometric Time Series. New York City: John Wiley.

Gorodnichenko, Y. (2014). Discussion of government spending multipliers in good times and in bad times: Evidence from U.S. historical data by Valerie Ramey and Sarah Zubairy. NBER Economic Fluctuations and Growth, Summer Meeting, Cambridge, MA.

Instituto Nacional De Geografia E Estatística (IBGE). (2021a). Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílio Contínua (PNAD Contínua). Disponível em: <>. Acesso em 10 de agosto de 2021.

______________ (2021b). Sistema de Contas Nacionais Trimestrais. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em 10 de agosto de 2021.

International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2021a). Data and Statistics. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em 10 de agosto de 2021.

______________ (2021b). World Economic Outlook June 2020. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em 10 de agosto de 2021.

Jordà, O.; Taylor, A. (2016). The Time for Austerity: Estimating the Average Treatment Effect of Fiscal Policy. Economic Journal, 126 (590), 219-255.

Keynes, J. M. (1936[ 2007]). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Krolzig, H. (1996). Statistical analysis of cointegrated VAR processes with Markovian regime shifts. SFB 373 Discussion Paper No. 25, 38p.

______________ (1997). Markov-switching vector autoregressions: Modelling, statistical inference, and application to business cycle analysis. Berlin: Springer.

______________(2003). Constructing turning point chronologies with MarkovSwitching Vector Autoregressive Models: The Euro-Zone business cycle. Discussion Paper in Economics, University of Oxford.

Libanio, G. (2010). A note on inflation targeting and economic growth in Brazil. Revista de Economia Política, 30, 73-88.

Minsky, H. P. (2008). Stabilizing and Unstable Economy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Ramey, V. A. (2011). Can Government Purchases Stimulate the Economy? Journal of Economic Literature, 49 (3): 673-85.

Ramey, V.; Zubairy, S. (2014). Government Spending Multipliers in Good Times and in Bad: Evidence from U.S. Historical Data. NBER Working Paper No. 20719.

Sims, C. A. (1990). Macroeconomics and reality. Modelling Economic Series. Oxford: Clarendon.

How to Cite
Araujo, E. L., Araújo, E. ., & Ferrari Filho, F. (2022). The Brazilian economic authorities’ action during the covid-19 crisis and an empirical analysis of the fiscal and monetary policies in the period 1996-2020. Brazilian Keynesian Review, 8(1), 92-109.