The Twin Deficits and the New Cambridge Approach: estimating the private expenditure equation for Brazil (2001-2018)
Abstract
The twin deficit hypothesis is a theoretical proposition that seeks to establish the causal relationship between the public budget and the external sector’s balance, the current account balance. Empirical studies try to gauge the causal relationship between the two balances, but the evidence does not form a consensus. This paper provides a critique of the methodology of such estimations, which do not elaborate on empirical, theoretical and methodological arguments to construct the econometric models for estimations. Conversely, we provide an alternative approach based on the modern New Cambridge approach, which does not assume the private sector as constant over time, to estimate a private expenditure equation for Brazil using quarterly data from 2001 to 2018. Results found agree with the critique to not assume the private sector as constant when constructing econometric models for Brazil in attempting to gauge at the causal relationship between the public budget and the current account balance. The private sector expenditure proves statistically significant with the stock of financial assets, stable relationship between private expenditure and private disposable income of the New Cambridge hypothesis, and that the housing sector is important in explaining private expenditure in the long run for Brazil.
Downloads
References
Anyadike-Danes, Michael (1982). “The “New Cambridge” Hypothesis and Fiscal Planning”. Cambridge Economic Policy Review, 8(1).
Araújo, T F; Oliveira, A.C.; Resende, M. F. C. & Moro, S. (2009). Déficits gêmeos e taxa de câmbio real. Revista de Economia Contemporânea, 13, p. 5-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-98482009000100001
Bagnai, A. (2006). Structural breaks and the twin deficits hypothesis. International Economics and Economic Policy, 3, 137-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-006-0050-8
Baharumshah, A. Z., Lau, E., & Khalid, A. M. (2006). Testing twin deficits hypothesis using VARs and variance decomposition. Journal of the Asia Pacific economy, 11(3), 331-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860600764245
Barro, R. J. (1974). Are government bonds net wealth?. Journal of political economy, 82(6), 1095-1117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260266
Bird, G., Pentecost, E., & Yang, Y. (2019). The twin deficits hypothesis: an empirical examination. Open Economies Review, 30, 759-777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-019-09541-x
Blanchard, O. J. (1985). Debt, deficits, and finite horizons. Journal of political economy, 93(2), 223-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261297
Buchanan, J. M. (1976). Barro on the Ricardian equivalence theorem. Journal of political economy, 84(2), 337-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260436
Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H. (1992). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/t0130
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?. Journal of econometrics, 54(1-3), 159-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
Ganchev, G. T., Stavrova, E., & Tsenkov, V. (2012). Testing the Twin Deficit Hypothesis: The Case of Central and Eastern European Countries. International Journal of Contemporary Economics & Administrative Sciences, 2(1).
Godley, W. (1999). Seven unsustainable processes. Special report.
Godley, W. & Cripps, F. (1983). Macroeconomics. Oxford University Press.
Godley, W., & Zezza, G. (1992). A simple stock flow model of the Danish economy. In Themes in modern macroeconomics (pp. 140-179). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12511-1_8
Kalou, S., & Paleologou, S. M. (2012). The twin deficits hypothesis: Revisiting an EMU country. Journal of Policy Modeling, 34(2), 230-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2011.06.002
Macedo e Silva, A. C., & Santos, C. H. D. (2011). Peering over the edge of the short period? The Keynesian roots of stock-flow consistent macroeconomic models. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(1), 105-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep083
Mellini, A., & SILVA, G. J. C. D. (2022). A teoria dos déficits gêmeos em um modelo stock-flow consistent dinâmico para uma economia aberta. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 42(3), 761-784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572022-3237
Minsky, Hyman P. (2015) Can" it" happen again?: essays on instability and finance. Routledge.
Mukhtar, T., Zakaria, M., & Ahmed, M. (2007). An empirical investigation for the twin deficits hypothesis in Pakistan. Journal of Economic Cooperation Among Islamic Countries, 28(4).
Nikiforos, M., & Zezza, G. (2018). Stock‐flow consistent macroeconomic models: A survey. Analytical Political Economy, 63-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119483328.ch4
Normandin, M. (1999). Budget deficit persistence and the twin deficits hypothesis. Journal of International Economics, 49(1), 171-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00058-0
Papadimitriou, Dimitri B., Nikiforos, M. & Zezza, G. (2013). The Greek economic crisis and the experience of austerity: a strategic analysis. Strategic Analysis, p. 1-25.
Paula, L. F. (2017). Equilíbrio distante: nota sobre a instabilidade financeira nacional. Insight Inteligência, v. XX, p.86-94.
Resende, M. F. D. C. (2009). Déficits gêmeos e poupança nacional: abordagem teórica. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 29, 24-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572009000100002
Summers, L. H. (1988). Tax policy and international competitiveness. In International aspects of fiscal policies (pp. 349-386). University of Chicago Press.
Zezza, G. (2009). Fiscal policy and the economics of financial balances. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies, 6(2), 289-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2009.02.11
Zezza, G., & Zezza, F. (2019). On the design of empirical stock–flow consistent models. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies, 16(1), 134-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2019.0046
Copyright (c) 2024 Giuliano Manera Longhi, Adriano José Pereira, Paulo Ricardo Feistel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors keep copyrights and concede to the Journal the right to the first publication, with the paper simultaneously licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which allows recognised author and journal work sharing.
- Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive versions of the paper published in this journal (e.g.: publish in an instituional repository or as a book chapter) with the recogntion of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed (and are estimulated) to publish and distribute their work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or at their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, once this may generate productive alterations on the paper, as well as increse the factor of impact and quotation of the published paper (please, see Free Access Effect)